<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1374 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775306</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata held that the notice issued u/s 143(2) was not in accordance with CBDT Instruction F. No. 225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23-06-2017, rendering the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) invalid and void. Consequently, the revisionary proceedings u/s 263 based on this invalid assessment were also held to be invalid and bad in law. The Tribunal quashed the order passed u/s 263, affirming that the assessee retains the right to challenge the validity of the assessment during appeal proceedings before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1374 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775306</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata held that the notice issued u/s 143(2) was not in accordance with CBDT Instruction F. No. 225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23-06-2017, rendering the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) invalid and void. Consequently, the revisionary proceedings u/s 263 based on this invalid assessment were also held to be invalid and bad in law. The Tribunal quashed the order passed u/s 263, affirming that the assessee retains the right to challenge the validity of the assessment during appeal proceedings before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>