https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775325 A GST assessment order was quashed in writ jurisdiction on a conditional basis where the assessee had not participated in the assessment proceedings and the appeal period had expired. The Court followed its settled practice of protecting revenue by requiring deposit of 25% of the disputed tax through the electronic cash ledger and filing of a reply within 30 days, treating the assessment order as an addendum to the show-cause notice. The quashment operated subject to compliance with those conditions. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775325 A GST assessment order was quashed in writ jurisdiction on a conditional basis where the assessee had not participated in the assessment proceedings and the appeal period had expired. The Court followed its settled practice of protecting revenue by requiring deposit of 25% of the disputed tax through the electronic cash ledger and filing of a reply within 30 days, treating the assessment order as an addendum to the show-cause notice. The quashment operated subject to compliance with those conditions. Case-Laws GST Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775325