<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1397 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775329</link>
    <description>The HC condoned a 70-day delay in filing an appeal against an adjudication order under the TNGST Act, accepting the petitioner&#039;s medical treatment and late knowledge of the order as valid reasons. The appeal was restored on condition that the petitioner pays Rs. 10,000 to a specified government medical institution within two weeks. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1397 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775329</link>
      <description>The HC condoned a 70-day delay in filing an appeal against an adjudication order under the TNGST Act, accepting the petitioner&#039;s medical treatment and late knowledge of the order as valid reasons. The appeal was restored on condition that the petitioner pays Rs. 10,000 to a specified government medical institution within two weeks. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>