<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1398 - MADHYA PRADES HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775330</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that no substantial question of law warranted its interference under Article 226. Allegations of violation of natural justice and GST provisions are to be addressed by the designated appellate authority. The petitioner was directed to pursue the alternative remedy provided by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1398 - MADHYA PRADES HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775330</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that no substantial question of law warranted its interference under Article 226. Allegations of violation of natural justice and GST provisions are to be addressed by the designated appellate authority. The petitioner was directed to pursue the alternative remedy provided by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>