<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1404 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775336</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to GST recovery measures was not entertained by granting interim restraint where the petitioner acknowledged the liability but sought time on grounds of financial hardship. The HC required the petitioner to use the statutory mechanism for deferment by applying to the Commissioner, and directed the authority to decide that request in accordance with law. No interim protection against recovery was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1404 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775336</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to GST recovery measures was not entertained by granting interim restraint where the petitioner acknowledged the liability but sought time on grounds of financial hardship. The HC required the petitioner to use the statutory mechanism for deferment by applying to the Commissioner, and directed the authority to decide that request in accordance with law. No interim protection against recovery was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>