<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1508 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462889</link>
    <description>An adjudication order may be set aside where the assessee was not given an effective opportunity to reply and be heard, as compliance with natural justice requires disclosure of relied upon documents and a meaningful personal hearing. The Madras HC quashed the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the department to furnish the documents again, allow replies, proceed year-wise with adequate interval, and issue prior notice of hearing. The fresh order was to be reasoned and deal with all submissions, while all rights, contentions, including limitation, were kept open and no finding on the merits was recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 20:35:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1508 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462889</link>
      <description>An adjudication order may be set aside where the assessee was not given an effective opportunity to reply and be heard, as compliance with natural justice requires disclosure of relied upon documents and a meaningful personal hearing. The Madras HC quashed the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the department to furnish the documents again, allow replies, proceed year-wise with adequate interval, and issue prior notice of hearing. The fresh order was to be reasoned and deal with all submissions, while all rights, contentions, including limitation, were kept open and no finding on the merits was recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>