<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45255</link>
    <description>A tribunal should not decide a valuation dispute on a ground not set out in the show-cause notice or otherwise put to the parties for response. Where the record shows that the appellants had no opportunity to meet the basis ultimately adopted, and additional documents also require consideration, the proper course is fresh disposal. The matter was therefore remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration in accordance with law after due notice and opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:45:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45255</link>
      <description>A tribunal should not decide a valuation dispute on a ground not set out in the show-cause notice or otherwise put to the parties for response. Where the record shows that the appellants had no opportunity to meet the basis ultimately adopted, and additional documents also require consideration, the proper course is fresh disposal. The matter was therefore remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration in accordance with law after due notice and opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>