<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 86 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45252</link>
    <description>Departmental confiscation of the gold bars rendered the pending Special Leave Petitions infructuous, and the Supreme Court dismissed them on that basis. The respondent was nevertheless given liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings in the proper forum to challenge the confiscation order, without any adjudication on its merits. As the confiscated goods remained in the petitioners&#039; custody, the Court directed that the respondent&#039;s bank guarantee should not be returned. The Court also recorded the Executive&#039;s undertaking regarding issuance of a detention certificate and waiver of demurrage charges if the respondent succeeds, but did not decide those issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 86 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45252</link>
      <description>Departmental confiscation of the gold bars rendered the pending Special Leave Petitions infructuous, and the Supreme Court dismissed them on that basis. The respondent was nevertheless given liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings in the proper forum to challenge the confiscation order, without any adjudication on its merits. As the confiscated goods remained in the petitioners&#039; custody, the Court directed that the respondent&#039;s bank guarantee should not be returned. The Court also recorded the Executive&#039;s undertaking regarding issuance of a detention certificate and waiver of demurrage charges if the respondent succeeds, but did not decide those issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>