<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Depreciation on Goodwill Allowed Under Section 32(1)(ii); Product Registration Expenses Deductible Under Section 37(1)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90761</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the allowability of depreciation on goodwill arising from a court-sanctioned amalgamation under section 32(1)(ii), rejecting the AO&#039;s disallowance and reliance on AS-26 and precedent. The tribunal affirmed that once depreciation is allowed, the carry-forward of unabsorbed depreciation is a vested right and cannot be denied without reversal by a competent forum, thereby dismissing the AO&#039;s disallowance of brought-forward depreciation. Product registration expenses were held to be revenue in nature and deductible under section 37(1), not capital expenditure. The claim for deduction under section 80-IC was sustained, as the Baddi Unit was found to have operational autonomy and no nexus was established to allocate corporate expe.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Depreciation on Goodwill Allowed Under Section 32(1)(ii); Product Registration Expenses Deductible Under Section 37(1)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90761</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the allowability of depreciation on goodwill arising from a court-sanctioned amalgamation under section 32(1)(ii), rejecting the AO&#039;s disallowance and reliance on AS-26 and precedent. The tribunal affirmed that once depreciation is allowed, the carry-forward of unabsorbed depreciation is a vested right and cannot be denied without reversal by a competent forum, thereby dismissing the AO&#039;s disallowance of brought-forward depreciation. Product registration expenses were held to be revenue in nature and deductible under section 37(1), not capital expenditure. The claim for deduction under section 80-IC was sustained, as the Baddi Unit was found to have operational autonomy and no nexus was established to allocate corporate expe.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>