<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1267 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775199</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA at New Delhi dismissed an appeal by the Enforcement Directorate seeking enhancement of penalty imposed under Section 13(1) of FEMA for contravention of Sections 7 &amp;amp; 8 involving failure to realize export proceeds. The Adjudicating Authority had imposed penalty at 100% of the contravened amount. The Tribunal held that Section 13(1) FEMA prescribes maximum penalty of three times the contravention amount but sets no minimum, making penalty imposition discretionary. The Tribunal found the Adjudicating Authority exercised judicious discretion considering case facts and evidence. Despite total penalty reaching 25 crores (200% of contravened amount), the Tribunal criticized the ED for filing enhancement appeals instead of executing recovery orders, especially when respondents were untraceable, making recovery negligible. The Tribunal deemed the imposed penalty adequate and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1267 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775199</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA at New Delhi dismissed an appeal by the Enforcement Directorate seeking enhancement of penalty imposed under Section 13(1) of FEMA for contravention of Sections 7 &amp;amp; 8 involving failure to realize export proceeds. The Adjudicating Authority had imposed penalty at 100% of the contravened amount. The Tribunal held that Section 13(1) FEMA prescribes maximum penalty of three times the contravention amount but sets no minimum, making penalty imposition discretionary. The Tribunal found the Adjudicating Authority exercised judicious discretion considering case facts and evidence. Despite total penalty reaching 25 crores (200% of contravened amount), the Tribunal criticized the ED for filing enhancement appeals instead of executing recovery orders, especially when respondents were untraceable, making recovery negligible. The Tribunal deemed the imposed penalty adequate and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>