<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1272 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775204</link>
    <description>The writ petition challenging the Designated Authority&#039;s final findings on the applicability of the 19 June 2025 notification and anti-dumping duty under Rule 18 became infructuous, so the court dismissed it on that ground. The disposition reflects no adjudication on the underlying merits of the notification or duty levy, only that the challenge no longer required determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1272 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775204</link>
      <description>The writ petition challenging the Designated Authority&#039;s final findings on the applicability of the 19 June 2025 notification and anti-dumping duty under Rule 18 became infructuous, so the court dismissed it on that ground. The disposition reflects no adjudication on the underlying merits of the notification or duty levy, only that the challenge no longer required determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>