https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45241 Compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F was treated as sufficient to make the appeal maintainable, because proof of deposit of the directed amount had been produced. The confiscated goods, being the subject of a pending appeal, could not be auctioned or otherwise disposed of in the absence of evidence that they were perishable or that immediate disposal was otherwise justified. The writ petition therefore succeeded, and protection was granted against disposal of the goods until the appellate proceedings were concluded. en-us Thu, 08 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:18:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45241 Compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F was treated as sufficient to make the appeal maintainable, because proof of deposit of the directed amount had been produced. The confiscated goods, being the subject of a pending appeal, could not be auctioned or otherwise disposed of in the absence of evidence that they were perishable or that immediate disposal was otherwise justified. The writ petition therefore succeeded, and protection was granted against disposal of the goods until the appellate proceedings were concluded. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45241