<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1314 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775246</link>
    <description>For prosecution of partners under the Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 319 CrPC could not be used to implead persons as accused unless the statutory preconditions were satisfied on the evidence. The Court noted that prior sanction under Section 279 was not shown, and the material did not establish that the applicants were in charge of and responsible for the firm&#039;s business, or that the alleged offence was committed with their consent, connivance, or neglect under Section 278B. An earlier order treating them only as representatives of the firm had already attained finality. The impleadment order was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1314 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775246</link>
      <description>For prosecution of partners under the Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 319 CrPC could not be used to implead persons as accused unless the statutory preconditions were satisfied on the evidence. The Court noted that prior sanction under Section 279 was not shown, and the material did not establish that the applicants were in charge of and responsible for the firm&#039;s business, or that the alleged offence was committed with their consent, connivance, or neglect under Section 278B. An earlier order treating them only as representatives of the firm had already attained finality. The impleadment order was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>