https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775254 The HC set aside an order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the respondent for violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner had filed a 130-page reply which was acknowledged in the order, but the respondent failed to provide mandatory personal hearing opportunity under Section 75(4) of the TNGST Act, 2017 before passing the impugned order. The court found this omission violated natural justice principles and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration after providing the petitioner an opportunity to establish their case on merits. The petition was allowed by way of remand. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775254 The HC set aside an order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the respondent for violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner had filed a 130-page reply which was acknowledged in the order, but the respondent failed to provide mandatory personal hearing opportunity under Section 75(4) of the TNGST Act, 2017 before passing the impugned order. The court found this omission violated natural justice principles and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration after providing the petitioner an opportunity to establish their case on merits. The petition was allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws GST Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775254