https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775260 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging an order under Section 129(3) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner failed to seek vehicle and goods release by making payment under Section 129(1)(a) and did not cooperate with authorities or provide required documents. The court found short recording of goods weight on the invoice, indicating improper conduct by the petitioner. The HC noted that despite claiming extreme urgency, the petitioner had not attempted statutory remedies and had misled the court about the actual circumstances. Given the availability of alternative appellate remedies under the Act, the court held the writ petition was not maintainable under Article 226. The petition was disposed of without relief, emphasizing that such matters should be pursued through proper statutory channels rather than extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775260 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging an order under Section 129(3) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner failed to seek vehicle and goods release by making payment under Section 129(1)(a) and did not cooperate with authorities or provide required documents. The court found short recording of goods weight on the invoice, indicating improper conduct by the petitioner. The HC noted that despite claiming extreme urgency, the petitioner had not attempted statutory remedies and had misled the court about the actual circumstances. Given the availability of alternative appellate remedies under the Act, the court held the writ petition was not maintainable under Article 226. The petition was disposed of without relief, emphasizing that such matters should be pursued through proper statutory channels rather than extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction. Case-Laws GST Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775260