<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Loan Disallowance Upheld Under Section 68 Due to Lack of Creditworthiness and KYC Non-Compliance</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90703</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the addition under section 68, holding that the assessee failed to establish the creditworthiness of the lender and the genuineness of the loan transaction. The lender&#039;s bank account was reopened without adherence to KYC norms, and the assessee did not provide essential details such as the lender&#039;s address or PAN, despite the lender becoming a shareholder. The cash deposit and immediate transfer to the assessee, coupled with the lender&#039;s non-resident status and lack of verifiable income source, undermined the claimed loan&#039;s authenticity. The tribunal affirmed the validity of the reassessment notice, noting that the reopening was based on tangible material indicating prima facie escapement of income and was sanctioned by comp.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:43:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:43:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Loan Disallowance Upheld Under Section 68 Due to Lack of Creditworthiness and KYC Non-Compliance</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90703</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the addition under section 68, holding that the assessee failed to establish the creditworthiness of the lender and the genuineness of the loan transaction. The lender&#039;s bank account was reopened without adherence to KYC norms, and the assessee did not provide essential details such as the lender&#039;s address or PAN, despite the lender becoming a shareholder. The cash deposit and immediate transfer to the assessee, coupled with the lender&#039;s non-resident status and lack of verifiable income source, undermined the claimed loan&#039;s authenticity. The tribunal affirmed the validity of the reassessment notice, noting that the reopening was based on tangible material indicating prima facie escapement of income and was sanctioned by comp.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:43:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>