<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1219 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775151</link>
    <description>ITAT Chandigarh dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed assessee&#039;s cross-objection. Regarding addition u/s 68 for unaccounted receipts of Rs. 204.57 lacs, the tribunal reduced the gross profit estimation from 6% to 3%, following precedent from earlier assessment years with similar facts. The AO was directed to re-compute accordingly. The tribunal deleted additions for alleged loans and interest income made solely on loose sheets without corroboration. These documents lacked the assessee&#039;s name or connection to their concerns, with no entries matching the regular books or seized cash books. The tribunal held that additions cannot be based on mere presumptions or assumptions. Since the case involved alleged loan granted rather than unexplained cash credit, Section 68 provisions were inapplicable. The loose sheets were deemed &quot;dumb documents&quot; insufficient to sustain any additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:43:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1219 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775151</link>
      <description>ITAT Chandigarh dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed assessee&#039;s cross-objection. Regarding addition u/s 68 for unaccounted receipts of Rs. 204.57 lacs, the tribunal reduced the gross profit estimation from 6% to 3%, following precedent from earlier assessment years with similar facts. The AO was directed to re-compute accordingly. The tribunal deleted additions for alleged loans and interest income made solely on loose sheets without corroboration. These documents lacked the assessee&#039;s name or connection to their concerns, with no entries matching the regular books or seized cash books. The tribunal held that additions cannot be based on mere presumptions or assumptions. Since the case involved alleged loan granted rather than unexplained cash credit, Section 68 provisions were inapplicable. The loose sheets were deemed &quot;dumb documents&quot; insufficient to sustain any additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>