<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1234 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775166</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the assessee regarding unexplained investment allegations concerning bogus share transactions. The assessee purchased shares of Diamant Infrastructure Ltd. in 2002 and sold them in 2011 for Rs. 1,99,350. The tribunal found sufficient evidence supporting both the purchase and sale transactions. Company records filed with RoC showed the assessee as a legitimate shareholder holding 200 shares under Folio No. 2691 since August 18, 2002. The Revenue failed to produce tangible evidence demonstrating the assessee&#039;s involvement in any bogus transactions dating back to 2002. Consequently, ITAT deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer, holding that the share transactions were genuine and properly documented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:43:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1234 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775166</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the assessee regarding unexplained investment allegations concerning bogus share transactions. The assessee purchased shares of Diamant Infrastructure Ltd. in 2002 and sold them in 2011 for Rs. 1,99,350. The tribunal found sufficient evidence supporting both the purchase and sale transactions. Company records filed with RoC showed the assessee as a legitimate shareholder holding 200 shares under Folio No. 2691 since August 18, 2002. The Revenue failed to produce tangible evidence demonstrating the assessee&#039;s involvement in any bogus transactions dating back to 2002. Consequently, ITAT deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer, holding that the share transactions were genuine and properly documented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>