https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775178 The HC dismissed the petition challenging an administrative decision, finding no extraordinary circumstances to warrant exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The petitioner argued violations of natural justice principles and questioned the reliability of an expert report. The court held that while its power to issue prerogative writs is plenary, it would not routinely interfere where an efficacious alternative remedy exists through the appellate authority. The grounds raised by the petitioner were deemed suitable for consideration by the appellate forum rather than requiring extraordinary judicial intervention. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits to avoid prejudicing future proceedings before the appropriate appellate authority. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:43:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775178 The HC dismissed the petition challenging an administrative decision, finding no extraordinary circumstances to warrant exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The petitioner argued violations of natural justice principles and questioned the reliability of an expert report. The court held that while its power to issue prerogative writs is plenary, it would not routinely interfere where an efficacious alternative remedy exists through the appellate authority. The grounds raised by the petitioner were deemed suitable for consideration by the appellate forum rather than requiring extraordinary judicial intervention. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits to avoid prejudicing future proceedings before the appropriate appellate authority. Case-Laws GST Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775178