https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775179 The Bombay HC dismissed a petition filed under Article 226, finding it an attempt to circumvent statutory pre-deposit requirements without valid grounds. The petitioner failed to provide pleadings explaining why the pre-deposit requirement should be waived. The court noted such petitions are filed merely to avoid pre-deposit obligations and are clogging court lists. Relying on Oberoi Constructions Limited precedent regarding exhaustion of alternative remedies, the HC found no exceptional circumstances warranting extraordinary jurisdiction. The court emphasized that Article 226 should not undermine statutory regimes and relegated the petitioner to pursue available alternative remedies, which were deemed efficacious. The petition was dismissed for non-maintainability due to availability of adequate alternative legal remedies. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:43:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775179 The Bombay HC dismissed a petition filed under Article 226, finding it an attempt to circumvent statutory pre-deposit requirements without valid grounds. The petitioner failed to provide pleadings explaining why the pre-deposit requirement should be waived. The court noted such petitions are filed merely to avoid pre-deposit obligations and are clogging court lists. Relying on Oberoi Constructions Limited precedent regarding exhaustion of alternative remedies, the HC found no exceptional circumstances warranting extraordinary jurisdiction. The court emphasized that Article 226 should not undermine statutory regimes and relegated the petitioner to pursue available alternative remedies, which were deemed efficacious. The petition was dismissed for non-maintainability due to availability of adequate alternative legal remedies. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775179