<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1249 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775181</link>
    <description>The HC granted ad interim bail to the petitioner accused of fraudulent availment of fake Input Tax Credit and illegal tax evasion. The petitioner had allegedly availed Rs. 2,75,23,442/- through M/s Sarthak Enterprises and Rs. 3,98,33,986/- through M/s Disha Enterprises along with his wife. The court noted that investigation was complete with complaint filed, making allegations and counter-allegations matters for trial. Considering the petitioner&#039;s clean criminal record, five months of incarceration since arrest, and applicable legal precedents cited by senior counsel, the court found sufficient grounds for bail. The bail application was allowed based on established legal principles and case circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:43:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1249 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775181</link>
      <description>The HC granted ad interim bail to the petitioner accused of fraudulent availment of fake Input Tax Credit and illegal tax evasion. The petitioner had allegedly availed Rs. 2,75,23,442/- through M/s Sarthak Enterprises and Rs. 3,98,33,986/- through M/s Disha Enterprises along with his wife. The court noted that investigation was complete with complaint filed, making allegations and counter-allegations matters for trial. Considering the petitioner&#039;s clean criminal record, five months of incarceration since arrest, and applicable legal precedents cited by senior counsel, the court found sufficient grounds for bail. The bail application was allowed based on established legal principles and case circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>