<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 136 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45212</link>
    <description>Show cause notices for recovery of duty were challenged at the writ stage, but the High Court declined to entertain the petition on merits and directed that the matter be decided first by the Assessing Authority through a speaking order. The petitioner was given liberty to file a reply to the notices, so the dispute was left to be examined in the first instance by the statutory authority rather than being quashed in writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 136 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45212</link>
      <description>Show cause notices for recovery of duty were challenged at the writ stage, but the High Court declined to entertain the petition on merits and directed that the matter be decided first by the Assessing Authority through a speaking order. The petitioner was given liberty to file a reply to the notices, so the dispute was left to be examined in the first instance by the statutory authority rather than being quashed in writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>