<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1594 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462836</link>
    <description>A subsisting anticipatory bail order requiring release on arrest was held not to carry any implied routine liberty to seek or grant police custody remand; if custodial interrogation was genuinely needed, the investigating agency had to approach the court that granted protection. Seeking remand on misstatements, and continuing detention through fresh bail-bond demands after the remand period, amounted to wilful disobedience and contempt against the investigating officer and the Magistrate. On the remaining respondents, no direct role in the remand or non-compliance was shown, so the contempt notices were discharged. The Court also directed that the ad-interim anticipatory bail continue until the criminal proceedings arising from the FIR conclude.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 15:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1594 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462836</link>
      <description>A subsisting anticipatory bail order requiring release on arrest was held not to carry any implied routine liberty to seek or grant police custody remand; if custodial interrogation was genuinely needed, the investigating agency had to approach the court that granted protection. Seeking remand on misstatements, and continuing detention through fresh bail-bond demands after the remand period, amounted to wilful disobedience and contempt against the investigating officer and the Magistrate. On the remaining respondents, no direct role in the remand or non-compliance was shown, so the contempt notices were discharged. The Court also directed that the ad-interim anticipatory bail continue until the criminal proceedings arising from the FIR conclude.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>