https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45206 The court allowed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of the application for condoning the delay in filing appeals against orders. The court considered valid reasons such as the lockout period, family problems, and sickness of the Managing Director for the delay. Relying on a Supreme Court ruling on liberal interpretation of limitation provisions, the court granted the petitioner an opportunity by condoning the delay, subject to payment of a Rs. 1,000 cost in each writ petition within three weeks. Failure to pay would confirm the first respondent's order, with the impugned proceedings set aside and the writ petitions allowed with conditions. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:39:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45206 The court allowed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of the application for condoning the delay in filing appeals against orders. The court considered valid reasons such as the lockout period, family problems, and sickness of the Managing Director for the delay. Relying on a Supreme Court ruling on liberal interpretation of limitation provisions, the court granted the petitioner an opportunity by condoning the delay, subject to payment of a Rs. 1,000 cost in each writ petition within three weeks. Failure to pay would confirm the first respondent's order, with the impugned proceedings set aside and the writ petitions allowed with conditions. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45206