https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90660 The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the First Appellate Authority's order that had wrongly rejected the refund claim on the ground of time limitation. The Tribunal held that the refund claim was valid and supported by the speaking Order-in-Original dated 15.12.2010, which ordered the refund of excess duty after finalization of the provisional assessment. The First Appellate Authority erred in overturning this Order-in-Original without challenging the foundational speaking order or the prior appellate order dated 13.07.2009, which had already set aside the initial rejection and had attained finality. The Tribunal found no evidence of unjust enrichment or failure on the appellant's part to pass on the tax incidence. Consequently, the..... en-us Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:58:41 +0530 Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:58:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90660 The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the First Appellate Authority's order that had wrongly rejected the refund claim on the ground of time limitation. The Tribunal held that the refund claim was valid and supported by the speaking Order-in-Original dated 15.12.2010, which ordered the refund of excess duty after finalization of the provisional assessment. The First Appellate Authority erred in overturning this Order-in-Original without challenging the foundational speaking order or the prior appellate order dated 13.07.2009, which had already set aside the initial rejection and had attained finality. The Tribunal found no evidence of unjust enrichment or failure on the appellant's part to pass on the tax incidence. Consequently, the..... Highlights Customs Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:58:41 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90660