https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45199 A challenge to a tribunal's pre-deposit direction failed where the reduced deposit amount showed that the plea of hardship had already been considered. The High Court found no unreasonableness or failure to consider the material placed before the Tribunal, and therefore declined interference on merits. Time was, however, granted to make the pre-deposit, and the appeal was protected to remain pending during that period. en-us Thu, 29 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:29:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45199 A challenge to a tribunal's pre-deposit direction failed where the reduced deposit amount showed that the plea of hardship had already been considered. The High Court found no unreasonableness or failure to consider the material placed before the Tribunal, and therefore declined interference on merits. Time was, however, granted to make the pre-deposit, and the appeal was protected to remain pending during that period. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45199