https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775079 Bombay HC dismissed a review petition challenging a judgment dated 1st October 2024. The petitioner sought review claiming error apparent on the face of record. The court found that following the consent order, the review petitioner had already appeared before NCLT and received a detailed order, demonstrating they had acted upon the judgment sought to be reviewed. The HC held that no case for review was established and dismissed the petition, finding no error apparent on the record warranting review of the original judgment. en-us Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jul 2025 08:25:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775079 Bombay HC dismissed a review petition challenging a judgment dated 1st October 2024. The petitioner sought review claiming error apparent on the face of record. The court found that following the consent order, the review petitioner had already appeared before NCLT and received a detailed order, demonstrating they had acted upon the judgment sought to be reviewed. The HC held that no case for review was established and dismissed the petition, finding no error apparent on the record warranting review of the original judgment. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775079