<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1171 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775103</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of penal interest paid to Janata Sahakari Bank for overdrawn cash credit facility. The AO had disallowed the expense considering it penal in nature. The tribunal held that under section 2(28A), &quot;interest&quot; includes any charge in respect of moneys borrowed or credit facility, encompassing penal interest. The assessee satisfied all conditions under section 36(1)(iii): money was borrowed for business purposes and interest was paid. The tribunal distinguished penal interest from prohibited payments, noting it was compensatory for breach of contractual obligation, not an offense under law. The payment was business-related and allowable under section 37(1). The assessment order was modified to allow the penal interest claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 08:25:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1171 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775103</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of penal interest paid to Janata Sahakari Bank for overdrawn cash credit facility. The AO had disallowed the expense considering it penal in nature. The tribunal held that under section 2(28A), &quot;interest&quot; includes any charge in respect of moneys borrowed or credit facility, encompassing penal interest. The assessee satisfied all conditions under section 36(1)(iii): money was borrowed for business purposes and interest was paid. The tribunal distinguished penal interest from prohibited payments, noting it was compensatory for breach of contractual obligation, not an offense under law. The payment was business-related and allowable under section 37(1). The assessment order was modified to allow the penal interest claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>