https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775117 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging attachment order and bank attachment notice, ruling that petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy through statutory appeal process. The court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction when proper appellate remedy was available. However, HC granted liberty to petitioner to file appeal before appellate authority within four weeks with 25% pre-deposit of disputed tax (15% additional to statutory 10%). The appellate authority was directed to accept the appeal despite limitation period expiry, provided the enhanced pre-deposit condition was met, and dispose of the matter expeditiously on merits in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jul 2025 08:25:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775117 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging attachment order and bank attachment notice, ruling that petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy through statutory appeal process. The court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction when proper appellate remedy was available. However, HC granted liberty to petitioner to file appeal before appellate authority within four weeks with 25% pre-deposit of disputed tax (15% additional to statutory 10%). The appellate authority was directed to accept the appeal despite limitation period expiry, provided the enhanced pre-deposit condition was met, and dispose of the matter expeditiously on merits in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775117