<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1198 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775130</link>
    <description>A provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act automatically ceases after one year under Section 83(2). Because the impugned attachment order had already crossed that statutory period, it no longer survived in law and could not continue to operate. The attachment was therefore quashed and set aside, and release of the bank account was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 08:25:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1198 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775130</link>
      <description>A provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act automatically ceases after one year under Section 83(2). Because the impugned attachment order had already crossed that statutory period, it no longer survived in law and could not continue to operate. The attachment was therefore quashed and set aside, and release of the bank account was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>