<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1202 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775134</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenged reversal of input tax credit arising from a supplier&#039;s non-payment of GST, with reliance on approval of the supplier&#039;s resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Pending disposal, the Court considered interim protection, disclosure of claim-related records, and production of the approved resolution plan, noting that the appellate tribunal had not yet been constituted. The respondents were directed to disclose relevant records, the petitioner was directed to place the approved resolution plan, and recovery of the disputed demand was stayed until disposal of the writ petition or further order, subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax in addition to amounts already deposited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1202 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775134</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenged reversal of input tax credit arising from a supplier&#039;s non-payment of GST, with reliance on approval of the supplier&#039;s resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Pending disposal, the Court considered interim protection, disclosure of claim-related records, and production of the approved resolution plan, noting that the appellate tribunal had not yet been constituted. The respondents were directed to disclose relevant records, the petitioner was directed to place the approved resolution plan, and recovery of the disputed demand was stayed until disposal of the writ petition or further order, subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax in addition to amounts already deposited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>