<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1565 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462824</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not excluded by the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, and an appellate remedy under Section 22 does not oust constitutional judicial review, so a challenge alleging lack of jurisdiction may be examined by the High Court. Material facts connected with the petitioner&#039;s unit and registered office in Maharashtra were treated as part of the cause of action, satisfying territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2). However, even where jurisdiction exists, the High Court may decline to entertain the petition on forum conveniens and alternate remedy grounds when another High Court is the more appropriate forum and parallel proceedings are pending elsewhere.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 23:27:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1565 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462824</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not excluded by the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, and an appellate remedy under Section 22 does not oust constitutional judicial review, so a challenge alleging lack of jurisdiction may be examined by the High Court. Material facts connected with the petitioner&#039;s unit and registered office in Maharashtra were treated as part of the cause of action, satisfying territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2). However, even where jurisdiction exists, the High Court may decline to entertain the petition on forum conveniens and alternate remedy grounds when another High Court is the more appropriate forum and parallel proceedings are pending elsewhere.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>