<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1582 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462825</link>
    <description>A decree for permanent injunction remains enforceable on every continuing breach, and mere lapse of about 40 years does not bar execution where later disobedience is alleged. Coercive enforcement by arrest, detention in civil prison, or attachment under the Code of Civil Procedure requires the statutory preconditions to be met, including a proper factual foundation, grounds stated in the application or affidavit, and a finding of wilful disobedience after giving the judgment-debtors an opportunity to object. Where those safeguards are absent, coercive execution cannot stand, although the decree-holder may proceed afresh in accordance with law if interference with possession continues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 23:27:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1582 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462825</link>
      <description>A decree for permanent injunction remains enforceable on every continuing breach, and mere lapse of about 40 years does not bar execution where later disobedience is alleged. Coercive enforcement by arrest, detention in civil prison, or attachment under the Code of Civil Procedure requires the statutory preconditions to be met, including a proper factual foundation, grounds stated in the application or affidavit, and a finding of wilful disobedience after giving the judgment-debtors an opportunity to object. Where those safeguards are absent, coercive execution cannot stand, although the decree-holder may proceed afresh in accordance with law if interference with possession continues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>