https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462826 A writ petition challenging an order under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was not entertained because the statute provided an effective appellate remedy under Section 26. The Court applied the alternative-remedy principle and held that, absent exceptional circumstances, grievances should be examined by the Appellate Tribunal rather than through writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The request for extension of time to file the appeal was also declined because the statute itself allowed condonation of delay before the appellate forum. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2025 23:27:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462826 A writ petition challenging an order under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was not entertained because the statute provided an effective appellate remedy under Section 26. The Court applied the alternative-remedy principle and held that, absent exceptional circumstances, grievances should be examined by the Appellate Tribunal rather than through writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The request for extension of time to file the appeal was also declined because the statute itself allowed condonation of delay before the appellate forum. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462826