<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1664 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462832</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest income from deposits with co-operative banks. The tribunal relied on precedent from The Rena Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd case, which permitted similar deductions under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned on investments/deposits with co-operative banks. The Principal CIT had erroneously exercised revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 to disallow the deduction. The tribunal held that the Principal CIT&#039;s action was without merit given the established precedent allowing such deductions for co-operative society assessees. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the deduction on interest income from co-operative bank deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 12:07:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1664 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462832</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest income from deposits with co-operative banks. The tribunal relied on precedent from The Rena Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd case, which permitted similar deductions under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned on investments/deposits with co-operative banks. The Principal CIT had erroneously exercised revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 to disallow the deduction. The tribunal held that the Principal CIT&#039;s action was without merit given the established precedent allowing such deductions for co-operative society assessees. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the deduction on interest income from co-operative bank deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>