https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45185 Pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court does not, by itself, stay operation of a CEGAT order directing unconditional release of goods. The High Court held that the order could not be treated as suspended merely because an appeal and stay application were filed, and it was competent to grant effective relief in the writ proceedings without sending the petitioners to the Supreme Court. As the non-compliance with the CEGAT direction had continued without justification, interim release of the goods was ordered, subject to payment of rent charges for the time being. en-us Mon, 08 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:47:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45185 Pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court does not, by itself, stay operation of a CEGAT order directing unconditional release of goods. The High Court held that the order could not be treated as suspended merely because an appeal and stay application were filed, and it was competent to grant effective relief in the writ proceedings without sending the petitioners to the Supreme Court. As the non-compliance with the CEGAT direction had continued without justification, interim release of the goods was ordered, subject to payment of rent charges for the time being. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 08 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45185