https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45184 Dismissal of an appeal for alleged non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was unsustainable where the record showed that the amount ordered under the earlier Section 35F direction had already been deposited and that compliance was not disputed. The later order rested on an incorrect assumption of default, so its foundation failed and reflected non-application of mind. The dismissal was set aside and the appeal restored to the Tribunal for decision on merits according to law. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:45:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45184 Dismissal of an appeal for alleged non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was unsustainable where the record showed that the amount ordered under the earlier Section 35F direction had already been deposited and that compliance was not disputed. The later order rested on an incorrect assumption of default, so its foundation failed and reflected non-application of mind. The dismissal was set aside and the appeal restored to the Tribunal for decision on merits according to law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45184