https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45177 The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner did not possess the necessary industrial licence required for concessional duty rates under Customs Notification No. 216/88. The court held that a letter from a Desk Officer did not qualify as an industrial licence and rejected the application of promissory estoppel. Allegations of discrimination by Customs authorities were dismissed, emphasizing compliance with legal procedures. The court directed the Union Government to take action against any officials breaching the law and ordered the petitioner to bear the costs of the proceedings. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:26:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45177 The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner did not possess the necessary industrial licence required for concessional duty rates under Customs Notification No. 216/88. The court held that a letter from a Desk Officer did not qualify as an industrial licence and rejected the application of promissory estoppel. Allegations of discrimination by Customs authorities were dismissed, emphasizing compliance with legal procedures. The court directed the Union Government to take action against any officials breaching the law and ordered the petitioner to bear the costs of the proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45177