<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (2) TMI 30 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45176</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application, ruling that the extension of the six-month period for issuing a show-cause notice was invalid. However, the confiscation and penalty imposed under the Customs Act were deemed legal. As the seized mica was found to be intended for export to Nepal in violation of prohibitions, it was vested in the Central Government, and no return to the petitioner was ordered. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (2) TMI 30 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45176</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application, ruling that the extension of the six-month period for issuing a show-cause notice was invalid. However, the confiscation and penalty imposed under the Customs Act were deemed legal. As the seized mica was found to be intended for export to Nepal in violation of prohibitions, it was vested in the Central Government, and no return to the petitioner was ordered. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>