<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payments for e-invoicing services don&#039;t qualify as Fees for Technical Services under Article 13(4)(c) India-UK DTAA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90638</link>
    <description>The HC held that the payments received by the assessee for providing e-invoicing services do not constitute fees for technical services (FTS) under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-UK DTAA or Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The Court emphasized that the &quot;make available&quot; condition requires the transfer of technical knowledge or skill enabling the recipient to independently use or exploit the technology. Here, the assessee&#039;s proprietary software license was non-exclusive and the training imparted did not transfer the technical knowhow or enable the recipient to generate e-invoices independently. Consequently, the receipts were not taxable as FTS under the DTAA or domestic law, negating the need to consider the applicability of Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:22:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payments for e-invoicing services don&#039;t qualify as Fees for Technical Services under Article 13(4)(c) India-UK DTAA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90638</link>
      <description>The HC held that the payments received by the assessee for providing e-invoicing services do not constitute fees for technical services (FTS) under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-UK DTAA or Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The Court emphasized that the &quot;make available&quot; condition requires the transfer of technical knowledge or skill enabling the recipient to independently use or exploit the technology. Here, the assessee&#039;s proprietary software license was non-exclusive and the training imparted did not transfer the technical knowhow or enable the recipient to generate e-invoices independently. Consequently, the receipts were not taxable as FTS under the DTAA or domestic law, negating the need to consider the applicability of Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii).</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:22:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>