<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1095 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775027</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision allowing deduction u/s 80IB(11A) despite the assessee&#039;s failure to file Form 10CCB within the due date. The tribunal relied on the Delhi HC decision in Shri Bawani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd., which followed SC precedents in Wipro Limited and G.M. Knitting, establishing that deductions can be claimed even when audit reports are not filed with the original return but are submitted before assessment completion. The CIT(Appeals) had directed the AO to verify if the audit report was filed with the revised return and allow the deduction accordingly, following the ITAT Mumbai decision in Kamdhenu Builders and Developers. The tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(Appeals) order and rejected the Revenue&#039;s grounds of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1095 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775027</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision allowing deduction u/s 80IB(11A) despite the assessee&#039;s failure to file Form 10CCB within the due date. The tribunal relied on the Delhi HC decision in Shri Bawani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd., which followed SC precedents in Wipro Limited and G.M. Knitting, establishing that deductions can be claimed even when audit reports are not filed with the original return but are submitted before assessment completion. The CIT(Appeals) had directed the AO to verify if the audit report was filed with the revised return and allow the deduction accordingly, following the ITAT Mumbai decision in Kamdhenu Builders and Developers. The tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(Appeals) order and rejected the Revenue&#039;s grounds of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>