<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45166</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the legality of the order extending the period for issuing a show cause notice. It held that the extension order was valid, complied with the rule of natural justice, and was supported by sufficient material before the Collector. The court found that the petitioner was not prejudiced by the extension as he had disowned the packages in question. The writ was not issued, and the petition was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45166</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the legality of the order extending the period for issuing a show cause notice. It held that the extension order was valid, complied with the rule of natural justice, and was supported by sufficient material before the Collector. The court found that the petitioner was not prejudiced by the extension as he had disowned the packages in question. The writ was not issued, and the petition was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>