<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1116 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775048</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that reopening assessment proceedings under section 147 against a deceased person is invalid when notices are issued in the dead person&#039;s name rather than to legal heirs. The tribunal established that legal heirs have no statutory obligation to inform tax authorities of an assessee&#039;s death, citing Alamelu Veerappan v. ITO. For valid proceedings against a deceased person, the department must identify legal heirs and serve notices specifically to them in their capacity as legal representatives within prescribed time limits. Issuing notices to a dead person is not merely a procedural defect but renders the entire proceeding void ab initio. The tribunal emphasized that serving notice to the correct person is a condition precedent for validity, not just a procedural requirement. Consequently, the section 148 notice issued in the deceased&#039;s name vitiated the entire proceeding, which was quashed and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:22:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1116 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775048</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that reopening assessment proceedings under section 147 against a deceased person is invalid when notices are issued in the dead person&#039;s name rather than to legal heirs. The tribunal established that legal heirs have no statutory obligation to inform tax authorities of an assessee&#039;s death, citing Alamelu Veerappan v. ITO. For valid proceedings against a deceased person, the department must identify legal heirs and serve notices specifically to them in their capacity as legal representatives within prescribed time limits. Issuing notices to a dead person is not merely a procedural defect but renders the entire proceeding void ab initio. The tribunal emphasized that serving notice to the correct person is a condition precedent for validity, not just a procedural requirement. Consequently, the section 148 notice issued in the deceased&#039;s name vitiated the entire proceeding, which was quashed and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>