https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45164 Detention of seized goods beyond the statutory period under the Customs Act was challenged on the basis that, absent extension, continued retention could not be sustained. The contention was noted as having force, but no final determination was made on the legality of continued detention or entitlement to immediate release. Instead, the competent authority was directed to dispose of the pending representation within a fortnight, leaving the petitioner free to pursue further relief if aggrieved. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:54:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45164 Detention of seized goods beyond the statutory period under the Customs Act was challenged on the basis that, absent extension, continued retention could not be sustained. The contention was noted as having force, but no final determination was made on the legality of continued detention or entitlement to immediate release. Instead, the competent authority was directed to dispose of the pending representation within a fortnight, leaving the petitioner free to pursue further relief if aggrieved. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45164