https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775061 A writ petition challenging rejection of a rectification request was disposed of with a conditional direction after the petitioner had not cooperated before the authority and had an available appellate remedy. The Court balanced the competing interests by requiring a partial pre-deposit before further relief, reflecting the statutory pre-deposit requirement linked to appeal. It also directed the petitioner to cooperate and furnish the records needed for reconsideration of the rectification application. On compliance, the respondent was required to pass a final order on merits within three months; failing compliance, the respondent could proceed as if the writ petition had been dismissed. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:22:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775061 A writ petition challenging rejection of a rectification request was disposed of with a conditional direction after the petitioner had not cooperated before the authority and had an available appellate remedy. The Court balanced the competing interests by requiring a partial pre-deposit before further relief, reflecting the statutory pre-deposit requirement linked to appeal. It also directed the petitioner to cooperate and furnish the records needed for reconsideration of the rectification application. On compliance, the respondent was required to pass a final order on merits within three months; failing compliance, the respondent could proceed as if the writ petition had been dismissed. Case-Laws GST Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775061