<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 998 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774930</link>
    <description>Regulation 33 of the Central Bank of India (Employees&#039;) Pension Regulations, 1995 was read as a composite safeguard: where pension for a compulsorily retired employee is reduced below full pension, prior consultation with the Board of Directors is required before the order is passed. The consultation requirement applies as a pre-decisional condition and cannot be cured by post facto approval. The employee&#039;s pension right was treated as a protected property right, so strict compliance with the regulation was necessary. A reduction made without prior consultation was therefore invalid, though the Bank could take a fresh decision after hearing the employee and consulting the Board.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 998 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774930</link>
      <description>Regulation 33 of the Central Bank of India (Employees&#039;) Pension Regulations, 1995 was read as a composite safeguard: where pension for a compulsorily retired employee is reduced below full pension, prior consultation with the Board of Directors is required before the order is passed. The consultation requirement applies as a pre-decisional condition and cannot be cured by post facto approval. The employee&#039;s pension right was treated as a protected property right, so strict compliance with the regulation was necessary. A reduction made without prior consultation was therefore invalid, though the Bank could take a fresh decision after hearing the employee and consulting the Board.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>