https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45136 The appellate court's sentencing power was confined to the limits available to the trial court, so a fine imposed beyond the Magistrate's maximum could not stand. The Supreme Court held that, where leave to appeal was limited to sentence, the High Court could not impose a fine exceeding the sentencing authority of the trial court. The request to remand the matter for reconsideration of imprisonment was rejected. The fine was therefore reduced to the maximum amount the Magistrate could have imposed, namely Rs. 2,000 on each appellant. en-us Thu, 09 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:36:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45136 The appellate court's sentencing power was confined to the limits available to the trial court, so a fine imposed beyond the Magistrate's maximum could not stand. The Supreme Court held that, where leave to appeal was limited to sentence, the High Court could not impose a fine exceeding the sentencing authority of the trial court. The request to remand the matter for reconsideration of imprisonment was rejected. The fine was therefore reduced to the maximum amount the Magistrate could have imposed, namely Rs. 2,000 on each appellant. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 09 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45136