<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1052 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774984</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur ruled on an addition under section 68 concerning bogus accommodation entries through fictitious purchase/sales transactions. The assessee inflated purchases using fictitious invoices while the goods were neither received from stated suppliers nor delivered to stated buyers. The department initially added Rs. 4,05,71,650 but the tribunal found this excessive. The court noted that since sales were properly recorded in books and not disputed by the department, including them in the addition would constitute double taxation. The assessee proposed restricting the addition to Rs. 12,50,000, which the department did not object to after consideration. The ITAT confirmed the addition at Rs. 12,50,000 instead of the original Rs. 4,05,71,650, directing the AO to make necessary recalculations based on survey materials establishing the bogus nature of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1052 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774984</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur ruled on an addition under section 68 concerning bogus accommodation entries through fictitious purchase/sales transactions. The assessee inflated purchases using fictitious invoices while the goods were neither received from stated suppliers nor delivered to stated buyers. The department initially added Rs. 4,05,71,650 but the tribunal found this excessive. The court noted that since sales were properly recorded in books and not disputed by the department, including them in the addition would constitute double taxation. The assessee proposed restricting the addition to Rs. 12,50,000, which the department did not object to after consideration. The ITAT confirmed the addition at Rs. 12,50,000 instead of the original Rs. 4,05,71,650, directing the AO to make necessary recalculations based on survey materials establishing the bogus nature of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>