<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1465 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462793</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC addressed redevelopment rights of society members during a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC affecting developer AA Estates. The court rejected the Resolution Professional&#039;s argument that free sale component rights could be delinked from Development Agreement obligations. The HC held that while AA Estates undergoes Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process with uncertain outcomes potentially leading to liquidation, society members cannot remain indefinitely without redeveloped homes or transit rent, forced to bear costs that AA Estates was obligated to pay. Finding prima facie case established, balance of convenience favoring petitioners, and irretrievable prejudice to society members without immediate relief, the court granted interim relief. The HC emphasized that writ courts possess authority to fashion appropriate interim relief when circumstances urgently demand intervention, despite IBC moratorium provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 23:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1465 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462793</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC addressed redevelopment rights of society members during a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC affecting developer AA Estates. The court rejected the Resolution Professional&#039;s argument that free sale component rights could be delinked from Development Agreement obligations. The HC held that while AA Estates undergoes Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process with uncertain outcomes potentially leading to liquidation, society members cannot remain indefinitely without redeveloped homes or transit rent, forced to bear costs that AA Estates was obligated to pay. Finding prima facie case established, balance of convenience favoring petitioners, and irretrievable prejudice to society members without immediate relief, the court granted interim relief. The HC emphasized that writ courts possess authority to fashion appropriate interim relief when circumstances urgently demand intervention, despite IBC moratorium provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>