<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 2056 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462798</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the assessee on salary income taxability for services rendered outside India. The tribunal held that salary income earned while staying abroad did not accrue in India and was therefore not taxable. The court clarified that absence of Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) cannot deny DTAA benefits, as TRC is required only when claiming specific treaty benefits. The assessee provided sufficient evidence of foreign stay, making the salary non-taxable under section 5(2). However, regarding house property income, the tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s ground, upholding the CIT(Appeals) decision that sustained the addition since no evidence was provided to prove the property was let out only partially during the assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:39:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 2056 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462798</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the assessee on salary income taxability for services rendered outside India. The tribunal held that salary income earned while staying abroad did not accrue in India and was therefore not taxable. The court clarified that absence of Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) cannot deny DTAA benefits, as TRC is required only when claiming specific treaty benefits. The assessee provided sufficient evidence of foreign stay, making the salary non-taxable under section 5(2). However, regarding house property income, the tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s ground, upholding the CIT(Appeals) decision that sustained the addition since no evidence was provided to prove the property was let out only partially during the assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>